AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to millions of articles from top publications available through your library.

Court of Appeals redefines distinction between the elements for intentional and depraved indifference murder.

NY Defender Digest

| June 13, 2003 | COPYRIGHT 2002 Aspen Publishers, Inc. (Hide copyright information)Copyright

Answering questions left unresolved by People v. Oswaldo Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373 (2002), the Court has re-visited what constitutes the factual distinction between intentional and depraved murder, People v. Hafeez, -- NY2d --, (6/10/03). In Sanchez, a sharply divided court upheld defendant's conviction for depraved murder, PL 125.25(2), over his claim that his actions constituted intentional murder only and that therefore, the depraved murder count, upon which the jury convicted after the two alternate theories were submitted in the alternative, as they must, People v. Galagher, 69 NY2d 525, was improper.

Defendant Sanchez, became embroiled in an argument in an apartment …

Related articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and more
May a verdict of depraved murder serve as a substitute for evidence of the...
Newspaper article from: NY Defender Digest March 7, 2003 700+ words
Court of Appeals again addresses itself to the distinction between...
Newspaper article from: NY Defender Digest October 22, 2004 700+ words
Has the distinction between intentional and depraved indifference murder...
Newspaper article from: NY Defender Digest August 16, 2002 700+ words
What is the correct order in which lesser included offenses must be...
Newspaper article from: NY Defender Digest January 30, 2004 700+ words
Trial court errs if it instructs justification on all indicted and lessers...
Newspaper article from: NY Defender Digest November 5, 2004 700+ words
©2013 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms and conditions

The AccessMyLibrary advertising network includes: womensforum.com GlamFamily