AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Terrorism: The war on terror has been criticized from all sides of the political spectrum. Too much is being spent. Not enough. It's not working. Is anyone right?
President Bush has taken unfriendly fire from all sides in the debate over the war on terror and homeland security. Hardly a day goes by that some wag, left or right, doesn't take a shot at U.S. efforts to make Americans more secure.
The Department of Homeland Security. The Patriot Act of 2001. The war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. These and other efforts have come in for ridicule. In some cases, criticism has been justified. But in other cases, it's been just plain silly -- partisan or factional carping intended to score political points and little else.
In just the last two days, you might have seen these headlines: "Security Spending Raises Questions" (USA Today). "Plan To Cut Airport Jobs Attacked" (The Associated Press).
Go back a few months, and you've seen the same and worse if you've been reading magazines. There you can find literally dozens of stories about how the White House is botching its war on terror.
But the critics are missing the big picture. If you don't believe that, just read the State Department's report on global terrorism.
As it does each year, that report points ...