AccessMyLibrary provides FREE access to over 30 million articles from top publications available through your library.
Argumentation and Advocacy articles from January 1 2008
This publication provides research and articles on argumentation studies, including contemporary or historical argumentation theory, informal logic, pragma-dialectics, interpersonal arguing, culture and argument, public and political/legal argument and forensics and pedagogy.
Set up an RSS feed
Create a link to this page
Copy and paste this link tag into your Web page or blog:
Argumentation and Advocacy archives from January 1 2008
Judging the Supreme Court: Construction of Motives in Bush v. Gore.(Book review)
January 1, 2008... Judging the Supreme Court: Construction of Motives in Bush v. Gore. By Clarke Rountree. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2007; pp. xvi + 510. $79.95 cloth.
It has been almost two decades since Gerald Wetlaufer (1990) argued...
Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory.(Book review)
January 1, 2008... Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Critical Legal Theory. By Francis J. Mootz III. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2006. 256 pp. $49.50 cloth.
I am always grateful for any attempt to revitalize the important historical and...
The language of argumentation in Dutch.(Report)
January 1, 2008... In principle, all languages have their own ways of expressing the concepts that are pertinent to dealing with argumentation and discussion. Depending on the languages that are being compared there may be striking structural similarities but...
Proleptic argumentation.(Report)
January 1, 2008... Proleptic argumentation, as defined in this paper, refers to the anticipation and answering of an objection or opposed argument before one's opponent has actually put it forward. As shown in the paper, proleptic argumentation can be...
Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument rebutted.(Report)
January 1, 2008... EPISTEMIC THEORIES OF ARGUMENT: AN OVERVIEW
The epistemic theory of argument is the view that arguments are to be evaluated in terms of their comprising epistemic reasons. This is to say, good arguments are those that are conducive of or...
Appealing to the brooding spirit of the law: good and evil in landmark judicial dissents.(Report)
January 1, 2008... When considering the role of judicial dissent, Chief Justice Hughes (1936) once wrote that "A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of law, to the intelligence of a future day when a later decision may possibly...